SEO & long-form content
On-page tests, content refresh cadences, internal linking experiments, and the case for short posts versus 3,400-word essays.
1,412 documented marketing experiments — hypothesis, channel, spend, sample size, and result delta — published in full. The largest open dataset of its kind run by an independent publisher.
Tiny Lessons, Compounding Growth. Field-tested, never theorized.
A Lab entry is a single marketing experiment run on a real newsletter, blog, or product — not a thought piece, not a list of "ten ideas you should try." Every row in the archive ships with the same six fields, in the same order, so the dataset stays comparable across years and channels:
The numbers are public because the publication has no sponsors and never has. Every dollar of revenue comes from subscriptions and the paid TLC Pro cohort, which means the dataset has no incentive to flatter any vendor, channel, or agency. If an experiment flopped — and many did — it ships in the archive with the same prominence as the wins. The full editorial policy is published at tlc-blog.com/editorial.
— The TLC editorial team, 9 editors and 4 contributing analysts.
A live slice of the archive. Each row links to the full write-up with the downloadable artifact (Notion template, Figma file, or sheet) attached.
| # | Experiment | Channel | Spend | Sample | Result Δ | Verdict | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0847 | Reply-rate vs. open-rate as the primary subject-line metric | Email · Lifecycle | $0 | 41,327 subs | +38% reply rate | Repeat | Read → |
| 1192 | Cutting the post from 4,200 to 3,400 words — does length hurt SEO? | SEO · Long-form | $420 | 612k sessions | +0.4% organic | Hold | Read → |
| 1306 | 90-second TL;DR audio on every post — does dwell time move? | Audio · On-page | $1,840 | 218k sessions | +22% avg. dwell | Repeat | Read → |
| 1371 | Cross-promo newsletter swap with three indie SaaS publishers | Partnerships | $0 | 11,400 subs | +612 net subs | Repeat | Read → |
| 1408 | Removing the popup — does list growth slow, churn, or invert? | Email · Acquisition | $0 | 90 days | −14% signups | Kill | Read → |
The proof points that justify treating the archive as a citable source — not a content category.
The archive is indexed by channel so a solo operator can find the 40 or 50 experiments most relevant to the work already on their plate this quarter.
On-page tests, content refresh cadences, internal linking experiments, and the case for short posts versus 3,400-word essays.
Subject lines, send cadence, reply-rate optimization, welcome sequences, and the open-rate metrics that turned out to be vanity.
Cross-posting cadence, thread formats, native video, and the experiments that tried (and mostly failed) to make a post go viral.
Newsletter swaps, podcast guest formats, TL;DR audio production, and the small set of partnership plays that compound.
The Lab is fully searchable — filter by channel, budget band, result delta, or verdict. The weekly letter delivers every new experiment the day it ships, with the raw data attached.